Work with Sovel
Start with a conversation, not a contract.
We usually start with a Decision-Card Sprint— a short working pass over the declined or deferred PHA recommendations you already have, turned into signed Decision Cards a named reviewer stands behind. What we'd need from you, and the scope, is something we figure out together on a call — not a form you fill out.
01 · The Decision-Card Sprint
A short working pass over your hardest dispositions.
- We work through the declined or deferred PHA recommendations you already have — the ones whose basis is thin or missing.
- Each becomes a signed Decision Card: the grounds, the evidence, and a qualified reviewer's sign-off, in one tamper-evident record.
- It fits naturally into a PHA revalidation or an audit cycle — when the reasoning behind a disposition is exactly what gets asked for.
02 · Common questions
The honest answers.
- Our CMMS already has AI.
- Does it tell you which declined recommendations have no documented basis? Their AI retrieves what's there. Sovel captures the reasoning that was never written down — and binds a qualified reviewer's sign-off to it.
- We'd build this internally.
- Maybe. The hard part isn't the storage — it's the reviewer-governance discipline and the domain encoding for PSM disposition. Worth a conversation before you spend the quarter on it.
- No budget for this.
- No hardware, no adoption curve, no change management. The first engagement is small and scoped to what's worth it for your plant — which is exactly what we'd figure out on a call.
- Is this blockchain on industrial IoT data?
- No. Sovel anchors reviewer-decision artifacts — roughly one sealed leaf per signed record — not raw IoT data. The provenance chain is invisible to the reviewer.
03 · Next step
Let's talk it through.
We're early and honest about it — Sovel is reviewer-built and pre-revenue. The way in is a conversation, not a purchase. You keep your data; Sovel keeps the audit chain.
Not a PSM facility? See the other Operating Packs.